lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 11/13] dt-bindings: power: add PX30 SoCs header for power-domain
    Date
    Hi,

    Am Sonntag, 13. Mai 2018, 17:18:12 CEST schrieb Tao Huang:
    > Hi Heiko:
    >
    > On 2018年05月12日 06:11, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
    > > Here I have a naming question. When looking at the vendor kernel
    > > it looks like the px30 is largely related to the rk3326.
    > > (rk3326.dtsi includeing the px30.dtsi)
    > >
    > > What is the reason for basing the naming on the px30 this time? And could
    > > we possibly keep to rkXXXX names for the basic things in the kernel, thus
    > > keeping the pxXX as second name, like with the other px-variants before?
    >
    > PX30 and RK3326 are different chips. PX30 has more features. You can simply
    > think that RK3326 is a subset of PX30. The RK3326 is more like a PX30
    > derivative chip. This is not the same as the previous chips. So we use PX30
    > instead of RK3326 for name, and the opening document is only for PX30, we
    > think this is more convenient for developers.

    ok, sounds reasonable :-) ... So we'll stay with the PX30.


    Heiko

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2018-05-13 22:53    [W:4.563 / U:0.004 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site