[lkml]   [2018]   [Apr]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: uprobes/perf: KASAN: use-after-free in uprobe_perf_close
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 12:40:10PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> But I still think that we should (try to) remove put_task_struct() from put_ctx().
> Quite possibly I missed something, but I think it only adds some confusion. Once
> again, even if ctx can't go away you can't use ctx->task without TASK_TOMBSTONE
> check, exactly because this task can exit. So why perf_event_context should add
> another reference?

Ah, I see what you mean. Yes that might be possible.

 \ /
  Last update: 2018-04-09 13:41    [W:0.039 / U:3.328 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site