Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] clk: qcom: gdsc: Add support to poll for higher timeout value | From | Taniya Das <> | Date | Mon, 9 Apr 2018 14:10:06 +0530 |
| |
Hello Stephen,
Thanks for the review comments.
On 4/6/2018 4:54 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Taniya Das (2018-04-02 03:45:44) >> From: Amit Nischal <anischal@codeaurora.org> >> >> For some gdscs, it might take longer time up to 500us for >> updating their status. So add support for the same by >> defining a new flag 'GDS_TIMEOUT' to mark such gdsc in >> order to poll their status for longer timeout value. >> >> Signed-off-by: Amit Nischal <anischal@codeaurora.org> >> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <tdas@codeaurora.org> >> --- > > Let's just increase the timeout to 500 if it's required? This is a > timeout, so we're not really expecting to hit it anyway so optimizing > the uncommon case is not useful. > --
Will fix this in the next series.
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >
-- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
--
|  |