[lkml]   [2018]   [Apr]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] clk: qcom: gdsc: Add support to poll for higher timeout value
Hello Stephen,

Thanks for the review comments.

On 4/6/2018 4:54 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Taniya Das (2018-04-02 03:45:44)
>> From: Amit Nischal <>
>> For some gdscs, it might take longer time up to 500us for
>> updating their status. So add support for the same by
>> defining a new flag 'GDS_TIMEOUT' to mark such gdsc in
>> order to poll their status for longer timeout value.
>> Signed-off-by: Amit Nischal <>
>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <>
>> ---
> Let's just increase the timeout to 500 if it's required? This is a
> timeout, so we're not really expecting to hit it anyway so optimizing
> the uncommon case is not useful.
> --

Will fix this in the next series.

> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
> the body of a message to
> More majordomo info at

QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.


 \ /
  Last update: 2018-04-09 10:41    [W:0.067 / U:3.480 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site