Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] mm: page_alloc: remain memblock_next_valid_pfn() on arm and arm64 | From | Jia He <> | Date | Wed, 4 Apr 2018 22:34:41 +0800 |
| |
sorry, will fix it right now
Cheer,
Jia
On 4/4/2018 10:19 PM, kbuild test robot Wrote: > Hi Jia, > > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: > > [auto build test ERROR on arm64/for-next/core] > [also build test ERROR on v4.16 next-20180403] > [cannot apply to linus/master mmotm/master] > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jia-He/mm-page_alloc-remain-memblock_next_valid_pfn-on-arm-and-arm64/20180404-200732 > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/core > config: i386-randconfig-x013-201813 (attached as .config) > compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-1) 7.3.0 > reproduce: > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > make ARCH=i386 > > All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > In file included from include/linux/gfp.h:6:0, > from include/linux/mm.h:10, > from mm/page_alloc.c:18: > mm/page_alloc.c: In function 'memmap_init_zone': >>> include/linux/mmzone.h:1299:28: error: called object is not a function or function pointer > #define next_valid_pfn (pfn++) > ~~~~^~~ >>> mm/page_alloc.c:5349:39: note: in expansion of macro 'next_valid_pfn' > for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; next_valid_pfn(pfn)) { > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > vim +1299 include/linux/mmzone.h > > 1296 > 1297 /* fallback to default defitions*/ > 1298 #ifndef next_valid_pfn >> 1299 #define next_valid_pfn (pfn++) > 1300 #endif > 1301 > > --- > 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
-- Cheers, Jia
| |