lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Apr]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 3/9] pinctrl: actions: Add Actions S900 pinctrl driver
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 07:03:46PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Hi Mani,
>
> Am 03.04.2018 um 19:00 schrieb Manivannan Sadhasivam:
> > On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 12:16:49AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 8:46 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam
> >> <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>> +static const struct pinconf_ops owl_pinconf_ops = {
> >>> + .is_generic = true,
> >>> + .pin_config_get = owl_pin_config_get,
> >>> + .pin_config_set = owl_pin_config_set,
> >>> + .pin_config_group_get = owl_group_config_get,
> >>> + .pin_config_group_set = owl_group_config_set
> >>
> >> It's still good idea to leave comma here...
> >>
> >
> > I'm confused. What is the criteria for removing/keeping comma for last member
> > of struct? I followed your gpio driver suggestion.
>
> No comma for list terminator ("{}") because nothing goes after it; comma
> whenever it allows adding a new line without touching the old one, i.e.
> keeping future diff small.
>

Thanks for the clarification Andreas! Keeping the future diff small is the
key, understood.

Thanks,
Mani

> Cheers,
> Andreas
>
> --
> SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
> GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
> HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-04-03 19:14    [W:0.076 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site