lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH -tip v2 4/7] kprobes: Replace %p with other pointer types
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 22:48:24 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 11:39:51 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 21:13:51 -0400
> > Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:10:03 +0900
> > > Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Replace %p with appropriate pointer types (or just remove it)
> > > > - Use %pS if possible
> > > > - Use %px only for the function right before BUG().
> > > > - Remove unneeded error message.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure "right before BUG()" is legitimate for using %px. Why not
> > > still use %pS?
> >
> > Since BUG() will dump all registers and stacks which includes
> > raw address information and reboot the system (means reset the
> > kaslr base offset), I thought it may not add additional damage.
>
> BUG() has been changed to print out %pS and not the address while doing
> the stack dump. It only prints the address if it doesn't find a
> function name. For example:
>
> CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.11.0-rc3-test+ #48
> Hardware name: MSI MS-7823/CSM-H87M-G43 (MS-7823), BIOS V1.6 02/22/2014
> Call Trace:
> dump_stack+0x68/0x92
> lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xf7/0x100
> rcu_read_lock+0x5f/0x61
> __is_insn_slot_addr+0x23/0x5c
> __kernel_text_address+0x4a/0x80
> show_trace_log_lvl+0x157/0x296
> ? module_assert_mutex_or_preempt+0x4f/0x51
> show_stack+0x3d/0x3f
> dump_stack+0x68/0x92
> __warn+0xc2/0xdd
> ? 0xffffffffa0026077
> warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f
> module_assert_mutex_or_preempt+0x4f/0x51
> __module_address+0x2a/0xac
> ? 0xffffffffa0026077
> __module_text_address+0x12/0x59
> ? 0xffffffffa0026077
> is_module_text_address+0xe/0x16
> __kernel_text_address+0x2b/0x80
> ? 0xffffffffa0026077
> unwind_get_return_address+0x50/0x5c
>

Ah...
OK, I'll fix that.

>
> >
> > Anyway, for this patch we can use %pS. For the next [5/7] patch,
> > I'm not sure %pS is good for dumping a stack address...
>
> Although it now is.

Got it.

Thank you!


--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-04-27 07:09    [W:0.106 / U:0.372 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site