Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 27 Apr 2018 22:39:59 +0300 | From | Dan Carpenter <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] bpf: btf: remove a couple conditions |
| |
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:55:46AM -0700, Martin KaFai Lau wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:20:25AM -0700, Martin KaFai Lau wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 05:04:59PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > We know "err" is zero so we can remove these and pull the code in one > > > indent level. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> > > Thanks for the simplification! > > > > Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> > btw, it should be for bpf-next. Please tag the subject with bpf-next when > you respin. Thanks! >
I'm working against linux-next. For networking, I have a separate tree which I use to figure out if it's in net or net-next. It's kind of a headache (but obviously networking is the largest subtree so it's required).
Is there an automated way to tie a Fixes tag from linux-next to a subtree?
regards, dan carpenter
| |