[lkml]   [2018]   [Apr]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] rhashtable_walk fixes
From: NeilBrown <>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 12:23:40 +1000

> I'm sorry if I've caused some confusion, but I didn't think that I was
> submitting patches to you and know nothing about your two trees.
> I was submitting patches to Thomas and Herbert, the registered
> maintainers of rhashtable. I assumed they would review, respond, and
> take responsibility for getting them upstream, if that's what they
> decided, based on whatever arrangements they have in place.
> If it is appropriate I can resend all of my patches that receive an
> Ack as a coherent series, and send this to you nominating a particular
> tree, but I'm unlikely to do that unless asked and told which tree to
> nominate.

Herbert and Thomas generally review rhashtable patches, but rhashtable
itself is generally maintained in the networking tree(s). So once
they review and ACK it, I would apply it.

 \ /
  Last update: 2018-04-03 04:35    [W:0.034 / U:2.600 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site