Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 02 Apr 2018 22:34:04 -0400 (EDT) | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] rhashtable_walk fixes | From | David Miller <> |
| |
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 12:23:40 +1000
> I'm sorry if I've caused some confusion, but I didn't think that I was > submitting patches to you and know nothing about your two trees. > I was submitting patches to Thomas and Herbert, the registered > maintainers of rhashtable. I assumed they would review, respond, and > take responsibility for getting them upstream, if that's what they > decided, based on whatever arrangements they have in place. > > If it is appropriate I can resend all of my patches that receive an > Ack as a coherent series, and send this to you nominating a particular > tree, but I'm unlikely to do that unless asked and told which tree to > nominate.
Herbert and Thomas generally review rhashtable patches, but rhashtable itself is generally maintained in the networking tree(s). So once they review and ACK it, I would apply it.
|  |