Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 19 Apr 2018 07:35:31 +0200 | From | Vitezslav Samel <> | Subject | Re: 4.15.17 regression: bisected: timeout during microcode update |
| |
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 06:53:30AM -0700, Raj, Ashok wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 02:22:12PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 02:08:40PM +0200, Vitezslav Samel wrote: > > > I switched to firmware-in-kernel early loading and that works OK. > > firmware-in-kernel means you compile your microcode image in linux?
Yes:
CONFIG_FW_LOADER=y CONFIG_EXTRA_FIRMWARE="intel-ucode/06-3c-03" CONFIG_EXTRA_FIRMWARE_DIR="/lib/firmware"
> Can you tell me which distro you are using? The ones we used > doesn't do late-loading (i.e echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/microcode/reload) > > I suspect that might be the problem.
Yes, this is it. I followed instructions included in current microcode package downloaded from intel website and added "echo 1 > /sys/dev..." to my Slackware's /etc/rc.d/rc.local.
> - Can you remove your builtin microcode, > - rename the /lib/firmware/intel-ucode so we don't find it during late loading. > - let the system boot completely > - then rename the intel-ucode back for this test. > - write 1 to reload and see if that update succeeds or fails?
Just tested, it fails.
Cheers,
Vita
> > Ok, and keep using that from now on. > > > > People should all move away from that late loading dance. I'm saying > > that in case someone else reads this on lkml. > > > > > But still, the reported issue is regression in 4.15.17 and 4.16+. > > > > Oh, I know it is a regression. > > > > @Ashok: anything particular about his microcode revision not being able > > to stomach late loading? > > nothing about the microcode itself comes to mind. I'm wondering if this > similar to the Arch linux that used late-load during booting might be an issue.
| |