Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86/tools/relocs: comments cleanup | From | Cao jin <> | Date | Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:59:25 +0800 |
| |
ping?
On 03/05/2018 03:15 PM, Cao jin wrote: > 1. typo fix: there -> their > 2. remove superfluous "by" > > Signed-off-by: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> > --- > arch/x86/tools/relocs.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/tools/relocs.c b/arch/x86/tools/relocs.c > index 5d73c443e778..fcf3fad01b08 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/tools/relocs.c > +++ b/arch/x86/tools/relocs.c > @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static struct section *secs; > > static const char * const sym_regex_kernel[S_NSYMTYPES] = { > /* > - * Following symbols have been audited. There values are constant and do > + * Following symbols have been audited. Their values are constant and do > * not change if bzImage is loaded at a different physical address than > * the address for which it has been compiled. Don't warn user about > * absolute relocations present w.r.t these symbols. > @@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ static void walk_relocs(int (*process)(struct section *sec, Elf_Rel *rel, > * to the start of the per_cpu area that does not change). > * > * Relocations that apply to the per_cpu area need to have their > - * offset adjusted by by the value of __per_cpu_load to make them > + * offset adjusted by the value of __per_cpu_load to make them > * point to the correct place in the loaded image (because the > * virtual address of .data..percpu is 0). > * >
-- Sincerely, Cao jin
| |