lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Apr]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 2/4] gpio: pca953x: add register definitions for pcal6524 and fix address calculation
From
Date
Hi Andy,

> Am 10.04.2018 um 20:06 schrieb Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>:
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 7:07 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com> wrote:
>> PCAL chips ("L" seems to stand for "latched") have additional
>> registers starting at address 0x40 to control the latches,
>> interrupt mask, pull-up and pull down etc.
>>
>> The constants are so far defined in a way that they fit for
>> the pcal9555a when shifted by the number of banks, i.e. multiplied
>> by 2.
>>
>> Now the pcal6524 has 3 banks which means the relative offset
>> must be multiplied by 4 which gives a wrong result if not done
>> carefully, since the base offset is already included in the offset.
>>
>> For the basic registers shared with all pca93xx/tca64xx chips
>> there is no such offset.
>>
>> Therefore, we add code to adjust the register number for exended
>> registers to the 24 bit accessor functions.
>>
>> And we add additional register offset constants (not yet used by
>> the driver code) which are specific to the pcal6524.
>>
>
> First of all, as I said, please split this to two patches. Don't mix the things.

Ok. Queued for v4.

>
>
>> + /* adjust register address for pcal6524 */
>> + if (reg >= PCAL953X_OUT_STRENGTH)
>> + reg -= PCAL953X_OUT_STRENGTH >> 1;
>> +
>
> Give me some days to think about it.

No problem. I'll wait with v4.

The only alternative I would see is to add new accessor function
pointers for the extended registers and have 0x00 based offsets,
but that is IMHO more ugly.

BR and thanks,
Nikolaus

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-04-11 07:01    [W:0.403 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site