Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] vsprintf: Consolidate handling of unknown pointer specifiers | From | Andy Shevchenko <> | Date | Tue, 10 Apr 2018 14:41:55 +0300 |
| |
On Mon, 2018-04-09 at 15:50 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > On Sat 2018-04-07 17:26:40, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 10:58 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > This change collides with my patch series. Can you elaborate what > > your > > thoughts are about my patches? Are you going incorporate them to > > your > > series? Should I send them independently? > > Good question. I think that the best solution will be that I go > over your patchset and just add all valid ones into printk.git > for-4.18.
I think about 1-7 and 9 that can go as is before your changes. And patch 8 postpone
> Then I will base v5 of this patchset on top of it.
I'm going for vacation tomorrow. Can you just take them into your series or apply to your tree?
> I should have done this earlier. But I did not expect that long > way for the access-check stuff. We originally planned to > do the access check first, see > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1520000254.10722.389.camel@linux.intel.com
Yeah, I didn't consider that your one patch became a series...
> But the access check patchset still need some love, so it makes > sense to switch the order.
I agree.
-- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Intel Finland Oy
| |