lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Apr]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 1/3] thermal: armada_thermal: Replace mdelay with usleep_range in armada370_init_sensor
Date
armada370_init_sensor() is never called in atomic context.

armada370_init_sensor() is set as ".init_sensor" in
struct armada_thermal_data.
".init_sensor" is called armada_thermal_probe().
armada_thermal_probe() is set as ".probe" in struct platform_driver.
This function is not called in atomic context.

Despite never getting called from atomic context, armada370_init_sensor()
calls mdelay() to busily wait.
This is not necessary and can be replaced with usleep_range() to
avoid busy waiting.

This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
And I also manually check it.

Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
---
drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
index ae75328..807fe74 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static void armada370_init_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev,
reg &= ~PMU_TDC0_START_CAL_MASK;
writel(reg, priv->control);

- mdelay(10);
+ usleep_range(10000, 11000);
}

static void armada375_init_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev,
--
1.9.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-04-10 10:13    [W:0.064 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site