lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Apr]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v9 5/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add support for qcom,smmu-v2 variant
From
Date
Hi Tomasz,

On 2018/4/10 21:14, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Yisheng,
>
> Sorry, I think we missed your question here.
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 3:12 PM Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Vivek,
>
>> On 2018/3/28 12:37, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>> Hi Yisheng
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/28/2018 6:54 AM, Yisheng Xie wrote:
>>>> Hi Vivek,
>>>>
>>>> On 2018/3/13 16:55, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>>>> +- power-domains: Specifiers for power domains required to be
> powered on for
>>>>> + the SMMU to operate, as per generic power domain
> bindings.
>>>>> +
>>>> In this patchset, power-domains is not used right? And you just do the
> clock gating,
>>>> but not power gating, right?
>>>
>>> We are handling the power-domains too. Please see the example in this
> binding doc.
>
>> I see, but I do not find the point in code of these patchset, do you mean
> PMIC(e.g mmcc)
>> will gate the power domain of SMMU(e.g. MDSS_GDSC of mmcc) when PMIC
> suspend?
>
>
> If respective SoC power domains is registered as a standard genpd PM
> domain, then the runtime PM subsystem will take care of power domain
> control at runtime suspend and resume.
>

Get it, thanks for your explain, I should have learned about this.

Thanks
Yisheng

> Best regards,
> Tomasz
>
> .
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-04-11 03:23    [W:1.076 / U:0.448 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site