lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Make set_handle_irq and handle_arch_irq generic, v3
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 02:20:12 PST (-0800), tglx@linutronix.de wrote:
> > This looks sensible. We have two options for getting this merged:
> >
> > 1) I'll take the whole lot through tip/irq/core
> >
> > 2) I'll apply patch 1/N to a special branch in tip. That branch will
> > contain
> > only this commit on top of 4.16-rc4 and can be pulled by the relevant
> > architecture maintainers, so they can apply their architecture specific
> > patches.
>
> Option 1 seems like the lowest overhead, as that way we don't need to sequence
> the patches between multiple trees. If all the other arch maintianers are OK
> with it then that works for me.

Ok, I wait for someone to yell NO until tuesday. If that doesn't happen I
pick it up.

> The 0-day robot found a new build warning on openrisc. I was plannning
> on submitting a v4 with this fix in it
>
> diff --git a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/irq.h
> b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/irq.h
> index d9eee0a2b7b4..eb612b1865d2 100644
> --- a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/irq.h
> +++ b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/irq.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,4 @@
> #define NO_IRQ (-1)
> -extern void set_handle_irq(void (*handle_irq)(struct pt_regs *));
> -
> #endif /* __ASM_OPENRISC_IRQ_H__ */
>
> I can submit a v4, or you can just grab it from

Just reply on the v3 openrisc patch with a v4 and I grab it from there.

Thanks,

tglx

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-03-10 00:01    [W:0.066 / U:0.196 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site