lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 09/11] cpufreq: tegra124-cpufreq: extend to support Tegra210
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 11:25:04PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 06/02/18 16:34, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > Tegra210 has a very similar CPU clocking scheme than Tegra124. So add
> > support in this driver. Also allow for the case where the CPU voltage is
> > controlled directly by the DFLL rather than by a separate regulator object.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c
> > index 4353025..f8e01a8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c
> > @@ -64,7 +64,8 @@ static void tegra124_cpu_switch_to_pllx(struct tegra124_cpufreq_priv *priv)
> > {
> > clk_set_parent(priv->cpu_clk, priv->pllp_clk);
> > clk_disable_unprepare(priv->dfll_clk);
> > - regulator_sync_voltage(priv->vdd_cpu_reg);
> > + if (priv->vdd_cpu_reg)
> > + regulator_sync_voltage(priv->vdd_cpu_reg);
> > clk_set_parent(priv->cpu_clk, priv->pllx_clk);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -89,10 +90,10 @@ static int tegra124_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > return -ENODEV;
> >
> > priv->vdd_cpu_reg = regulator_get(cpu_dev, "vdd-cpu");
> > - if (IS_ERR(priv->vdd_cpu_reg)) {
> > - ret = PTR_ERR(priv->vdd_cpu_reg);
> > - goto out_put_np;
> > - }
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->vdd_cpu_reg) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > + priv->vdd_cpu_reg = NULL;
> > + else
> > + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>
> I am still not sure that we should rely on the fact that the regulator
> is not present in DT to imply that we do not need it. I think that we
> should be checking if we are using I2C mode here.
>

The cpufreq driver doesn't know this however. Also the current approach of
setting the same voltage when switching to pll_x is incorrect. The CVB
tables when using pll_x include more margin than when using the DFLL.

Peter.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-03-09 09:16    [W:0.307 / U:0.232 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site