[lkml]   [2018]   [Mar]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Subjectlinux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:


between commit:

47b7e7f82802 ("netfilter: don't set F_IFACE on ipv6 fib lookups")

from the net tree and commit:

b75cc8f90f07 ("net/ipv6: Pass skb to route lookup")

from the net-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_fib_ipv6.c
index 62fc84d7bdff,3230b3d7b11b..000000000000
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_fib_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_fib_ipv6.c
@@@ -180,7 -180,9 +180,8 @@@ void nft_fib6_eval(const struct nft_exp

*dest = 0;
- rt = (void *)ip6_route_lookup(nft_net(pkt), &fl6, lookup_flags);
- again:
+ rt = (void *)ip6_route_lookup(nft_net(pkt), &fl6, pkt->skb,
+ lookup_flags);
if (rt->dst.error)
goto put_rt_err;

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-03-05 00:02    [W:0.042 / U:0.304 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site