Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] io: prevent compiler reordering on the default writeX() implementation | From | Sinan Kaya <> | Date | Fri, 30 Mar 2018 10:46:05 -0400 |
| |
On 3/30/2018 10:29 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote: > In the abscence of a write barrier or when using a strongly ordered > architecture, writeX() should at least have a compiler barrier in > it to prevent commpiler from clobbering the execution order.
Same is true for readX(). I'll wait for review feedback on this before posting another change for readX().
-- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
| |