Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 3 Mar 2018 18:48:08 +0100 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] perf: a different approach to perf_rotate_context() |
| |
On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 04:43:16PM +0000, Song Liu wrote: > > In any case, there's a ton of conflict against the patches here: > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git/log/?h=perf/testing > > > > And with those the idea was to move to a virtual time based scheduler > > (basically schedule those flexible events that have the biggest lag -- > > that also solves 1). > > Thanks for these information. I will study this approach. Maybe that is > our path to PMU sharing.
So I'm really not convinced on that whole PMU sharing.
> What's is the status of this work? Would it > land in 4.17?
These patches might make 4.17, they got held up because of the whole meltdown/spectre crap and I need to get back to them.
| |