Messages in this thread | | | From | "陈华才" <> | Subject | Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector | Date | Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:57:17 +0800 |
| |
Hi, Tony and Fabio,
Could you please upload your kernel binary to somewhere for me? I don't understand why some ARM boards is OK while others are broken.
Huacai
------------------ Original ------------------ From: "Andrew Morton"<akpm@linux-foundation.org>; Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2018 03:15 AM To: "Fabio Estevam"<festevam@gmail.com>; Cc: "Tony Lindgren"<tony@atomide.com>; "Huacai Chen"<chenhc@lemote.com>; "Stephen Rothwell"<sfr@canb.auug.org.au>; "Rich Felker"<dalias@libc.org>; "Russell King"<linux@arm.linux.org.uk>; "Yoshinori Sato"<ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>; "linux-kernel"<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; "Ralf Baechle"<ralf@linux-mips.org>; "linux-omap"<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>; "James Hogan"<james.hogan@mips.com>; "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>; Subject: Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 15:45:27 -0300 Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Looks like commit 5638790dadae ("zboot: fix stack protector in > > compressed boot phase") breaks booting on arm. > > Yes, almost all imx are broken in linux-next due to this commit: > https://kernelci.org/soc/imx/job/next/kernel/next-20180323/
Thanks, I dropped it and I expect Stephen will also do that. | |