Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ftrace tree with the jc_docs tree | From | Tom Zanussi <> | Date | Wed, 21 Mar 2018 15:55:52 -0500 |
| |
On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 09:15 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 21 Mar 2018 15:37:15 +1100 > Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > On Wed, 21 Mar 2018 15:31:27 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the ftrace tree got a conflict in: > > > > > > Documentation/trace/ftrace.txt > > > (converted to Documentation/trace/ftrace.rst) > > > > There was another conflict involving > > > > Documentation/trace/events.{txt,rst} > > > > Unfortunately, I accidentally deleted the report email before sending > > it :-( > > > > Ug yeah. All the histogram code was ripped out of the events.txt and > a new file was created called histogram.txt. I'm guessing that should > also be converted into an .rst file. >
Yeah, linux-next has changes to Documentation/trace/* that converts those files to .rst, which linux-trace/frace/core doesn't have.
I've rebased the inter-event patches to linux-next/next-20180320 to reflect those changes, which affect 9 of the files in the patchset. The updated patchset is here:
https://github.com/tzanussi/linux-trace-inter-event.git tzanussi/next-20180320-inter-event-v10 https://github.com/tzanussi/linux-trace-inter-event/tree/tzanussi/next-20180320-inter-event-v10
I can repost the whole thing as v10, or whatever makes sense here.
Thanks,
Tom
> -- Steve
| |