lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Mar]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] autofs4: Use wait_event_killable
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018, Matthew Wilcox wrote:

> diff --git a/fs/autofs4/waitq.c b/fs/autofs4/waitq.c
> index a0c57c37fa21..c160e9b3aa0f 100644
> --- a/fs/autofs4/waitq.c
> +++ b/fs/autofs4/waitq.c
> @@ -19,9 +19,6 @@
> */
> static autofs_wqt_t autofs4_next_wait_queue = 1;
>
> -/* These are the signals we allow interrupting a pending mount */
> -#define SHUTDOWN_SIGS (sigmask(SIGKILL) | sigmask(SIGINT) | sigmask(SIGQUIT))
> -
> void autofs4_catatonic_mode(struct autofs_sb_info *sbi)
> {
> struct autofs_wait_queue *wq, *nwq;
> @@ -486,29 +483,7 @@ int autofs4_wait(struct autofs_sb_info *sbi,
> * wq->name.name is NULL iff the lock is already released
> * or the mount has been made catatonic.
> */
> - if (wq->name.name) {
> - /* Block all but "shutdown" signals while waiting */
> - unsigned long shutdown_sigs_mask;
> - unsigned long irqflags;
> - sigset_t oldset;
> -
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&current->sighand->siglock, irqflags);
> - oldset = current->blocked;
> - shutdown_sigs_mask = SHUTDOWN_SIGS & ~oldset.sig[0];
> - siginitsetinv(&current->blocked, shutdown_sigs_mask);
> - recalc_sigpending();
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&current->sighand->siglock, irqflags);
> -
> - wait_event_interruptible(wq->queue, wq->name.name == NULL);
> -
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&current->sighand->siglock, irqflags);
> - current->blocked = oldset;
> - recalc_sigpending();
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&current->sighand->siglock, irqflags);
> - } else {
> - pr_debug("skipped sleeping\n");
> - }
> -
> + wait_event_killable(wq->queue, wq->name.name == NULL);
> status = wq->status;
>
> /*

I understand converting the wait_event_interruptible() to
wait_event_killable(), but why was the above wait_event_interruptible()
only called when wq->name.name != NULL?

wait_event_{killable,interruptible}() will return without sleeping when
wq->name.name == NULL, so I suppose it has something to do with the
comment above it.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-03-19 20:27    [W:0.097 / U:0.516 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site