Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 12 Mar 2018 20:26:44 +0100 | From | Stephen Kitt <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] device_handler: remove VLAs |
| |
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:41:26 +0000, Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com> wrote: > On Sat, 2018-03-10 at 14:14 +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: > > The two patches I sent were supposed to be alternative solutions; see > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=152063671005295&w=2 for the > > introduction (I seem to have messed up the headers, so the mails didn’t > > end up threaded properly). > > The two patches arrived in my inbox several minutes before the cover > letter. In the e-mail header of the cover letter I found the following: > > X-Greylist: delayed 1810 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, > 09 Mar 2018 18:05:08 EST > > Does this mean that the delay happened due to vger server's anti-spam > algorithm?
That’s right, the greylisting part of its anti-spam measures.
Regards,
Stephen [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |