Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:28:45 +0100 | From | Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <> | Subject | [PATCH] kernel/rtmutex: Handle non enqueued waiters gracefully in remove_waiter() |
| |
In -RT task_blocks_on_rt_mutex() may return with -EAGAIN due to (->pi_blocked_on == PI_WAKEUP_INPROGRESS) before it added itself as a waiter. In such a case we must not call remove_waiter() because without a waiter it will trigger the BUG_ON() statement.
This was initially reported by Yimin Deng. Thomas Gleixner fixed it then with an explicit check for waiters before calling remove_waiter() with the following note:
| Guard it with rt_mutex_has_waiters(). This is a quick fix which is | easy to backport. The proper fix is to have a central check in | remove_waiter() so we can call it unconditionally.
This is the suggested change. Now that it is possible to call remove_waiter() unconditionally I also remove that check from rt_mutex_slowlock().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAAh1qt=DCL9aUXNxanP5BKtiPp3m+qj4yB+gDohhXPVFCxWwzg@mail.gmail.com Reported-and-debugged-by: Yimin Deng <yimin11.deng@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> --- kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c index 65cc0cb984e6..57d28d8f5280 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c @@ -1068,12 +1068,15 @@ static void mark_wakeup_next_waiter(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) { - bool is_top_waiter = (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)); + bool is_top_waiter = false; struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock); struct rt_mutex *next_lock; lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); + if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) + is_top_waiter = waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); + raw_spin_lock(¤t->pi_lock); rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter); current->pi_blocked_on = NULL; @@ -1268,8 +1271,7 @@ rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, if (unlikely(ret)) { __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); - if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) - remove_waiter(lock, &waiter); + remove_waiter(lock, &waiter); rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(ret, chwalk, &waiter); } -- 2.16.2
| |