Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Wed, 7 Feb 2018 10:39:11 +0000 | From | Dave Martin <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 13/20] arm64: capabilities: Clean up midr range helpers |
| |
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 06:28:00PM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > We are about to introduce generic MIDR range helpers. Clean > up the existing helpers in erratum handling, preparing them > to use generic version. > > Cc: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c > index 22ec3960a0c5..4351d48b0b0f 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c > @@ -174,20 +174,35 @@ static void qcom_enable_link_stack_sanitization( > } > #endif /* CONFIG_HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR */ > > -#define MIDR_RANGE(model, min, max) \ > - .type = ARM64_CPUCAP_LOCAL_CPU_ERRATUM, \ > - .matches = is_affected_midr_range, \ > - .midr_model = model, \ > - .midr_range_min = min, \ > - .midr_range_max = max > +#define CAP_MIDR_RANGE(model, v_min, r_min, v_max, r_max) \ > + .matches = is_affected_midr_range, \ > + .midr_model = model, \ > + .midr_range_min = MIDR_CPU_VAR_REV(v_min, r_min), \ > + .midr_range_max = MIDR_CPU_VAR_REV(v_max, r_max) > > -#define MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(model) \ > - .type = ARM64_CPUCAP_LOCAL_CPU_ERRATUM, \ > - .matches = is_affected_midr_range, \ > - .midr_model = model, \ > - .midr_range_min = 0, \ > +#define CAP_MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(model) \ > + .matches = is_affected_midr_range, \ > + .midr_model = model, \ > + .midr_range_min = MIDR_CPU_VAR_REV(0, 0), \ > .midr_range_max = (MIDR_VARIANT_MASK | MIDR_REVISION_MASK) > > +#define ERRATA_MIDR_RANGE(model, v_min, r_min, v_max, r_max) \ > + .type = ARM64_CPUCAP_LOCAL_CPU_ERRATUM, \ > + CAP_MIDR_RANGE(model, v_min, r_min, v_max, r_max) > + > +/* Errata affecting a range of revisions of given model variant */ > +#define ERRATA_MIDR_REV_RANGE(m, var, r_min, r_max) \ > + ERRATA_MIDR_RANGE(m, var, r_min, var, r_max) > + > +/* Errata affecting a single variant/revision of a model */ > +#define ERRATA_MIDR_REV(model, var, rev) \ > + ERRATA_MIDR_RANGE(model, var, rev, var, rev) > + > +/* Errata affecting all variants/revisions of a given a model */ > +#define ERRATA_MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(model) \ > + .type = ARM64_CPUCAP_LOCAL_CPU_ERRATUM, \ > + CAP_MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(model) > + > const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_errata[] = { > #if defined(CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_826319) || \ > defined(CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_827319) || \ > @@ -196,7 +211,7 @@ const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_errata[] = { > /* Cortex-A53 r0p[012] */ > .desc = "ARM errata 826319, 827319, 824069", > .capability = ARM64_WORKAROUND_CLEAN_CACHE, > - MIDR_RANGE(MIDR_CORTEX_A53, 0x00, 0x02), > + ERRATA_MIDR_REV_RANGE(MIDR_CORTEX_A53, 0x0, 0x0, 0x2),
Nit: since you're mostly ommiting the redundant 0x0* prefixes in new ERRATA_MIDR_RANGE(), maybe it's worth getting rid of all of them. Not a big deal though.
The prefixes are a bit random prior to this patch (0x00 versus 0x0 etc.)
[...]
Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cheers ---Dave
| |