lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Feb]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] tracing/power: Polish the tracepoints cpu_idle and cpu_frequency
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:14:41AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On 2/28/2018 3:45 AM, Du, Changbin wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 05:39:38PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 17:35:27 +0800
> > > "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > From the tracing perspective:
> > > > >
> > > > > Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > > > >
> > > > > -- Steve
> > > > Hi Steve, will you pick this or someoneelse?
> > > I maintain the tracing infrastructure, but the tracing use cases are
> > > maintained by the maintainers of the users of the trace events. That
> > > is, who added these trace events? They are the ones most affected by
> > > these changes.
> > >
> > > For example, it looks like Rafael J. Wysocki, is the one that added
> > > trace_cpu_frequency(). He's the one that is affected by this change,
> > > and is the one that you need to have take it.
> > >
> > Got it, thanks!
> >
> > Hi Wysocki, could you take a look?
>
> Please send the patch(es) to linux-pm@vger.kernel.org with a CC to me and I
> will take care of them.
>
sure~

> Thanks,
> Rafael
>

--
Thanks,
Changbin Du

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-02-28 10:16    [W:0.475 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site