Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 27 Feb 2018 10:18:00 +0100 | From | Jens Freimann <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] virtio: introduce packed ring defines |
| |
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 09:54:58AM +0100, Jens Freimann wrote: >On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 07:18:00PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: >>Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com> >>--- >>include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h | 18 +++++++++- >>include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >>diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h >>index 308e2096291f..e3d077ef5207 100644 >>--- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h >>+++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h >>@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ >> * transport being used (eg. virtio_ring), the rest are per-device feature >> * bits. */ >>#define VIRTIO_TRANSPORT_F_START 28 >>-#define VIRTIO_TRANSPORT_F_END 34 >>+#define VIRTIO_TRANSPORT_F_END 37 >> >>#ifndef VIRTIO_CONFIG_NO_LEGACY >>/* Do we get callbacks when the ring is completely used, even if we've >>@@ -71,4 +71,20 @@ >> * this is for compatibility with legacy systems. >> */ >>#define VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM 33 >>+ >>+/* This feature indicates support for the packed virtqueue layout. */ >>+#define VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED 34 > >Spec says VIRTIO_F_PACKED_RING not RING_PACKED
Ignore this. Seems to have changed.
regards, Jens
| |