lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] stackleak: Update for arm64
From
Date
On 02/22/2018 08:58 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Laura,
>
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 05:13:02PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>
>> arm64 has another layer of indirection in the RTL.
>> Account for this in the plugin.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> scripts/gcc-plugins/stackleak_plugin.c | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/gcc-plugins/stackleak_plugin.c b/scripts/gcc-plugins/stackleak_plugin.c
>> index 6fc991c98d8b..7dfaa027423f 100644
>> --- a/scripts/gcc-plugins/stackleak_plugin.c
>> +++ b/scripts/gcc-plugins/stackleak_plugin.c
>> @@ -244,6 +244,11 @@ static unsigned int stackleak_final_execute(void)
>> * that insn.
>> */
>> body = PATTERN(insn);
>> + /* arm64 is different */
>> + if (GET_CODE(body) == PARALLEL) {
>> + body = XEXP(body, 0);
>> + body = XEXP(body, 0);
>> + }
>
> Like most kernel developers, I don't know the first thing about GCC internals
> so I asked our GCC team and Richard (CC'd) reckons this should be:
>
> if (GET_CODE(body) == PARALLEL)
> body = XVECEXP(body, 0, 0);
>
> instead of the hunk above. Can you give that a go instead, please?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Will
>

Yep, seems to work fine and makes sense from my understanding of
gcc internals. I'll fix it up for the next version. Thanks for the
review!

Laura

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-02-22 20:40    [W:0.078 / U:0.596 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site