lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 05/10] pwm: add PWM mode to pwm_config()
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 02:01:16PM +0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
> Add PWM mode to pwm_config() function. The drivers which uses pwm_config()
> were adapted to this change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
> ---

-snip-

> diff --git a/drivers/media/rc/ir-rx51.c b/drivers/media/rc/ir-rx51.c
> index 49265f02e772..a971b02ea021 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/rc/ir-rx51.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/rc/ir-rx51.c
> @@ -55,10 +55,13 @@ static int init_timing_params(struct ir_rx51 *ir_rx51)
> {
> struct pwm_device *pwm = ir_rx51->pwm;
> int duty, period = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(NSEC_PER_SEC, ir_rx51->freq);
> + struct pwm_caps caps = { };
>
> duty = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(ir_rx51->duty_cycle * period, 100);
>
> - pwm_config(pwm, duty, period);
> + pwm_get_caps(pwm->chip, pwm, &caps);
> +
> + pwm_config(pwm, duty, period, BIT(ffs(caps.modes) - 1));
>
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/media/rc/pwm-ir-tx.c b/drivers/media/rc/pwm-ir-tx.c
> index 27d0f5837a76..c630e1b450a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/rc/pwm-ir-tx.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/rc/pwm-ir-tx.c
> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ static int pwm_ir_tx(struct rc_dev *dev, unsigned int *txbuf,
> {
> struct pwm_ir *pwm_ir = dev->priv;
> struct pwm_device *pwm = pwm_ir->pwm;
> + struct pwm_caps caps = { };
> int i, duty, period;
> ktime_t edge;
> long delta;
> @@ -68,7 +69,9 @@ static int pwm_ir_tx(struct rc_dev *dev, unsigned int *txbuf,
> period = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(NSEC_PER_SEC, pwm_ir->carrier);
> duty = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(pwm_ir->duty_cycle * period, 100);
>
> - pwm_config(pwm, duty, period);
> + pwm_get_caps(pwm->chip, pwm, &caps);
> +
> + pwm_config(pwm, duty, period, BIT(ffs(caps.modes) - 1));
>
> edge = ktime_get();
>

The two PWM rc-core drivers need PWM_MODE(NORMAL), not the first available
mode that the device supports. If mode normal is not supported, then probe
should fail.


Sean

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-02-22 14:09    [W:0.122 / U:0.496 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site