lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Feb]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/4] kernel/fork: switch vmapped stack callation to __vmalloc_area()
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 7:23 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
<khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>
>
> On 21.02.2018 03:16, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 16:57:21 +0300 Konstantin Khlebnikov
>> <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>>
>>> # stress-ng --clone 100 -t 10s --metrics-brief
>>> at 32-core machine shows boost 35000 -> 36000 bogo ops
>>>
>>> Patch 4/4 is a kind of RFC.
>>> Actually per-cpu cache of preallocated stacks works faster than buddy
>>> allocator thus
>>> performance boots for it happens only at completely insane rate of
>>> clones.
>>>
>>
>> I'm not really sure what to make of this patchset. Is it useful in any
>> known real-world use cases?
>
>
> Not yet. Feel free to ignore last patch.
>
>>
>>> + This option neutralize stack overflow protection but allows to
>>> + achieve best performance for syscalls fork() and clone().
>>
>>
>> That sounds problematic, but perhaps acceptable if the fallback only
>> happens rarely.
>>
>> Can this code be folded into CONFIG_VMAP_STACk in some cleaner fashion?
>> We now have options for non-vmapped stacks, vmapped stacks and a mix
>> of both.
>>
>> And what about this comment in arch/Kconfig:VMAP_STACK:
>>
>> This is presently incompatible with KASAN because KASAN expects
>> the stack to map directly to the KASAN shadow map using a
>> formula
>> that is incorrect if the stack is in vmalloc space.
>>
>>
>> So VMAP_STACK_AS_FALLBACK will intermittently break KASAN?
>>
>
> All of this (including CONFIG_VMAP_STACK) could be turned into boot option.
> I think this would be a best solution.

Or someone could *fix* KASAN to work with stacks in the vmalloc area.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-02-21 17:36    [W:0.061 / U:1.336 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site