Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] softirq: Per vector deferment to workqueue
On 2018-02-15 17:13:52 [+0100], Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > Yeah that makes sense. These workqueues are too much headaches eventually. > I'm going to try that ksoftirqd thing.
I may have something for that USB problem, I just need some testing before posting…