Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] reset: add support for non-DT systems | From | Sekhar Nori <> | Date | Wed, 14 Feb 2018 20:29:48 +0530 |
| |
On Wednesday 14 February 2018 12:09 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> > > The reset framework only supports device-tree. There are some platforms > however, which need to use it even in legacy, board-file based mode. > > An example of such architecture is the DaVinci family of SoCs which > supports both device tree and legacy boot modes and we don't want to > introduce any regressions. > > We're currently working on converting the platform from its hand-crafted > clock API to using the common clock framework. Part of the overhaul will > be representing the chip's power sleep controller's reset lines using > the reset framework. > > This changeset extends the core reset code with a new field in the > reset controller struct which contains an array of lookup entries. Each > entry contains the device name and an additional, optional identifier > string. > > Drivers can register a set of reset lines using this lookup table and > concerned devices can access them using the regular reset_control API. > > This new function is only called as a fallback in case the of_node > field is NULL and doesn't change anything for current users. > > Tested with a dummy reset driver with several lookup entries. > > An example lookup table can look like this: > > static const struct reset_lookup foobar_reset_lookup[] = { > [FOO_RESET] = { .dev = "foo", .id = "foo_id" }, > [BAR_RESET] = { .dev = "bar", .id = NULL }, > { } > }; > > where FOO_RESET and BAR_RESET will correspond with the id parameters > of reset callbacks. > > Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> > Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> > Cc: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
This should really help get rid of the private davinci_clk_reset_assert() API. Thanks for getting this done.
I noticed that the array based API still remains DT only. Its not a concern for DaVinci so it can probably be supported when its really needed.
Reviewed-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Thanks, Sekhar
| |