Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 2/6] iommu/arm-smmu: Add pm_runtime/sleep ops | From | Vivek Gautam <> | Date | Thu, 1 Feb 2018 11:43:57 +0530 |
| |
On 1/31/2018 5:53 PM, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 19/01/18 11:43, Vivek Gautam wrote: >> From: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> >> >> The smmu needs to be functional only when the respective >> master's using it are active. The device_link feature >> helps to track such functional dependencies, so that the >> iommu gets powered when the master device enables itself >> using pm_runtime. So by adapting the smmu driver for >> runtime pm, above said dependency can be addressed. >> >> This patch adds the pm runtime/sleep callbacks to the >> driver and also the functions to parse the smmu clocks >> from DT and enable them in resume/suspend. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> >> Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org> >> [vivek: Clock rework to request bulk of clocks] >> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> >> --- >> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 55 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c >> index 78d4c6b8f1ba..21acffe91a1c 100644 >> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c >> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c >> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ >> #include <linux/of_iommu.h> >> #include <linux/pci.h> >> #include <linux/platform_device.h> >> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h> >> #include <linux/slab.h> >> #include <linux/spinlock.h> >> @@ -205,6 +206,9 @@ struct arm_smmu_device { >> u32 num_global_irqs; >> u32 num_context_irqs; >> unsigned int *irqs; >> + struct clk_bulk_data *clocks; >> + int num_clks; >> + const char * const *clk_names; > > This seems unnecessary, as we use it a grand total of of once, during > initialisation when we have the source data directly to hand. Just > pass data->clks into arm_smmu_init_clks() as an additional argument.
Sure, will do that. > > Otherwise, I think this looks reasonable; it's about as unobtrusive as > it's going to get.
Thanks for reviewing.
regards Vivek
> > Robin. > >> u32 cavium_id_base; /* Specific to Cavium */ >> @@ -1685,6 +1689,25 @@ static int arm_smmu_id_size_to_bits(int size) >> } >> } >> +static int arm_smmu_init_clocks(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu) >> +{ >> + int i; >> + int num = smmu->num_clks; >> + >> + if (num < 1) >> + return 0; >> + >> + smmu->clocks = devm_kcalloc(smmu->dev, num, >> + sizeof(*smmu->clocks), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!smmu->clocks) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) >> + smmu->clocks[i].id = smmu->clk_names[i]; >> + >> + return devm_clk_bulk_get(smmu->dev, num, smmu->clocks); >> +} >> + >> static int arm_smmu_device_cfg_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu) >> { >> unsigned long size; >> @@ -1897,10 +1920,12 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_cfg_probe(struct >> arm_smmu_device *smmu) >> struct arm_smmu_match_data { >> enum arm_smmu_arch_version version; >> enum arm_smmu_implementation model; >> + const char * const *clks; >> + int num_clks; >> }; >> #define ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(name, ver, imp) \ >> -static struct arm_smmu_match_data name = { .version = ver, .model = >> imp } >> +static const struct arm_smmu_match_data name = { .version = ver, >> .model = imp } >> ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(smmu_generic_v1, ARM_SMMU_V1, GENERIC_SMMU); >> ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(smmu_generic_v2, ARM_SMMU_V2, GENERIC_SMMU); >> @@ -2001,6 +2026,8 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_dt_probe(struct >> platform_device *pdev, >> data = of_device_get_match_data(dev); >> smmu->version = data->version; >> smmu->model = data->model; >> + smmu->clk_names = data->clks; >> + smmu->num_clks = data->num_clks; >> parse_driver_options(smmu); >> @@ -2099,6 +2126,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct >> platform_device *pdev) >> smmu->irqs[i] = irq; >> } >> + err = arm_smmu_init_clocks(smmu); >> + if (err) >> + return err; >> + >> err = arm_smmu_device_cfg_probe(smmu); >> if (err) >> return err; >> @@ -2197,7 +2228,27 @@ static int __maybe_unused >> arm_smmu_pm_resume(struct device *dev) >> return 0; >> } >> -static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(arm_smmu_pm_ops, NULL, arm_smmu_pm_resume); >> +static int __maybe_unused arm_smmu_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) >> +{ >> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >> + >> + return clk_bulk_prepare_enable(smmu->num_clks, smmu->clocks); >> +} >> + >> +static int __maybe_unused arm_smmu_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) >> +{ >> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >> + >> + clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(smmu->num_clks, smmu->clocks); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static const struct dev_pm_ops arm_smmu_pm_ops = { >> + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(NULL, arm_smmu_pm_resume) >> + SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(arm_smmu_runtime_suspend, >> + arm_smmu_runtime_resume, NULL) >> +}; >> static struct platform_driver arm_smmu_driver = { >> .driver = { >>
| |