Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Fri, 28 Dec 2018 13:15:15 +0100 | From | Michal Hocko <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 00/21] PMEM NUMA node and hotness accounting/migration |
| |
On Fri 28-12-18 17:42:08, Wu Fengguang wrote: [...] > Those look unnecessary complexities for this post. This v2 patchset > mainly fulfills our first milestone goal: a minimal viable solution > that's relatively clean to backport. Even when preparing for new > upstreamable versions, it may be good to keep it simple for the > initial upstream inclusion.
On the other hand this is creating a new NUMA semantic and I would like to have something long term thatn let's throw something in now and care about long term later. So I would really prefer to talk about long term plans first and only care about implementation details later.
> > I haven't looked at the implementation yet but if you are proposing a > > special cased zone lists then this is something CDM (Coherent Device > > Memory) was trying to do two years ago and there was quite some > > skepticism in the approach. > > It looks we are pretty different than CDM. :) > We creating new NUMA nodes rather than CDM's new ZONE. > The zonelists modification is just to make PMEM nodes more separated.
Yes, this is exactly what CDM was after. Have a zone which is not reachable without explicit request AFAIR. So no, I do not think you are too different, you just use a different terminology ;)
-- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |