lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Dec]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] printk: increase devkmsg write() ratelimit
On (12/18/18 18:47), Borislav Petkov wrote:
> So how much is not strict?
>
> And what happens if you raise that ratelimiting level and the *one* line
> which is most important for debugging an issue

Like you said, for debugging devkmsg=off works just fine. I don't mind
the ratelimiting and want to keep it; I just don't want errors to be
ratelimited.

> All I'm saying is, gradually raising the limit is the wrong approach
> - there will always be a case where something important doesn't get
> logged.

Well, OK.

> What we need is a different solution, maybe what Rostedt proposes or
> so...

Sure, a different approach and idea are welcome. This is RFC thread.

-ss

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-12-19 02:51    [W:0.145 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site