lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 1/7] tpm: dynamically allocate the allocated_banks array
From
Date
On 12/12/2018 7:32 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 06:56:33PM +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
>> 2 PCR selections
>> hash TPM_ALG_SHA1
>> TPMS_PCR_SELECTION length 3
>> ff ff ff
>> hash TPM_ALG_SHA256
>> TPMS_PCR_SELECTION length 3
>> 00 00 00
>>
>> The pcr_select fields - "ff ff ff" and "00 00 00" - are bit masks for
>> the enabled PCRs. The SHA1 bank is enabled for all PCRs (0-23), while
>> the SHA256 bank is not enabled.
>
> Uh, thanks. Can you add a note to the commit message?

Ok.


>>>
>>> /* Check that at least some of the PCRs have been allocated. This is
>>> * required because CAP_PCRS ...
>>> */
>>> if (memchr_inv(pcr_selection.pcr_select, 0, pcr_selection.size_of_select))
>>> nr_allocated_banks++;
>>>
>>> [yeah, comment would be awesome about CAP_PCRS. Did not finish up the
>>> comment because I don't know the answer]
>>>
>>> In addition, it would be consistent to call the local variable also
>>> nr_allocated_banks (not nr_alloc_banks).
>>
>> Unfortunately, I exceed the limit of characters per line.
>
> Not sure what you mean?

---
- chip->allocated_banks[nr_alloc_banks] = hash_alg;
+ chip->allocated_banks[nr_alloc_banks].alg_id = hash_alg;
---

If I use nr_allocated_banks, the line above (see patch 5/7) exceeds the
limit of 80 characters.

Roberto


> /Jarkko
>

--
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063
Managing Director: Bo PENG, Jian LI, Yanli SHI

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-12-13 09:15    [W:0.064 / U:0.480 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site