Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 11 Dec 2018 14:55:49 +0530 | From | Viresh Kumar <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] PM / OPP: Always expose one supply in debugfs |
| |
On 10-12-18, 11:54, Quentin Perret wrote: > On Monday 10 Dec 2018 at 11:32:47 (+0000), Quentin Perret wrote: > > On some platforms, the opp_table->regulator_count field is kept at zero > > even though opp->supplies is always allocated. However, the loop used to > > display the supplies in the debugfs doesn't deal correctly with this, > > which results in the supplies not being displayed in debugfs on those > > platforms. > > > > Fix this by making sure to always display at least once supply in > > debugfs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> > > > > --- > > > > This has been observed on Juno r2 which uses SCPI and Hikey960 which > > uses DT. I am not particularly familiar with that part of the code, so > > I'm not sure if this is even remotely correct (hence the RFC tag). > > > > I first thought setting opp_table->regulator_count to 1 would be the > > right fix but that causes other issues. This fix seems to work OK on > > Juno and Hikey960, at least. > > > > Feedback is welcome :-) > > Hmm, so I just figured what I'm doing here is basically reverting: > > 1fae788ed640 ("PM / OPP: Don't create debugfs "supply-0" directory unnecessarily") > > Should I send a proper revert instead of this patch ? It _is_ handy to > read voltage numbers when available.
First of all I am really happy that someone apart from me is using this debug interface :)
At least that patch was correct and if we have to fix something, it should be fixed somewhere else.
I tried to reproduce the issue on hikey and straight away understood why it is behaving that way. There is no "cpu-supply" property defined for the CPUs.
I looked at juno driver and couldn't see any references to voltage there. Are you trying to add that support ?
Anyway, this should still be fixed irrespective of the "cpu-supply" property. The other fix you mentioned about setting opp_table->regulator_count to 1 is actually the right thing to do but the fix may require changes at multiple places. I can help writing a patch for that if you want, else I am open to you giving it a shot :)
Thanks.
-- viresh
| |