Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Applied "regulator: core: Clean enabling always-on regulators + their supplies" to the regulator tree | Date | Tue, 11 Dec 2018 20:36:57 +0000 (GMT) |
| |
The patch
regulator: core: Clean enabling always-on regulators + their supplies
has been applied to the regulator tree at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
From 4c9ed27f79fe4fb46db42dd0c6e69328371f2f3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 08:17:19 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] regulator: core: Clean enabling always-on regulators + their supplies
At the end of regulator_resolve_supply() we have historically turned on our supply in some cases. This could be for one of two reasons:
1. If resolving supplies was happening before the call to set_machine_constraints() we needed to predict if set_machine_constraints() was going to turn the regulator on and we needed to preemptively turn the supply on. 2. Maybe set_machine_constraints() happened before we could resolve supplies (because we failed the first time to resolve) and thus we might need to propagate an enable that already happened up to our supply.
Historically regulator_resolve_supply() used _regulator_is_enabled() to decide whether to turn on the supply.
Let's change things a little bit. Specifically:
1. Let's try to enable the supply and the regulator in the same place, both in set_machine_constraints(). This means that we have exactly the same logic for enabling the supply and the regulator. 2. Let's properly set use_count when we enable always-on or boot-on regulators even for those that don't have supplies. The previous commit 1fc12b05895e ("regulator: core: Avoid propagating to supplies when possible") only did this right for regulators with supplies. 3. Let's make it clear that the only time we need to enable the supply in regulator_resolve_supply() is if the main regulator is currently in use. By using use_count (like the rest of the code) to decide if we're going to enable our supply we keep everything consistent.
Overall the new scheme should be cleaner and easier to reason about. In addition to fixing regulator_summary to be more correct (because of the more correct use_count), this change also has the effect of no longer using _regulator_is_enabled() in this code path. _regulator_is_enabled() could return an error code for some regulators at bootup (like RPMh) that can't read their initial state. While one can argue that the design of those regulators is sub-optimal, the new logic sidesteps this brokenness. This fix in particular fixes observed problems on Qualcomm sdm845 boards which use the above-mentioned RPMh regulator. Those problems were made worse by commit 1fc12b05895e ("regulator: core: Avoid propagating to supplies when possible") because now we'd think at bootup that the SD regulators were already enabled and we'd never try them again.
Fixes: 1fc12b05895e ("regulator: core: Avoid propagating to supplies when possible") Reported-by: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Tested-by: Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> --- drivers/regulator/core.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c index 4981ed71686d..925fa0f5d7cb 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c @@ -1356,11 +1356,21 @@ static int set_machine_constraints(struct regulator_dev *rdev, * and we have control then make sure it is enabled. */ if (rdev->constraints->always_on || rdev->constraints->boot_on) { + if (rdev->supply) { + ret = regulator_enable(rdev->supply); + if (ret < 0) { + _regulator_put(rdev->supply); + rdev->supply = NULL; + return ret; + } + } + ret = _regulator_do_enable(rdev); if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL) { rdev_err(rdev, "failed to enable\n"); return ret; } + rdev->use_count++; } if ((rdev->constraints->ramp_delay || rdev->constraints->ramp_disable) @@ -1822,15 +1832,18 @@ static int regulator_resolve_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev) return ret; } - /* Cascade always-on state to supply */ - if (_regulator_is_enabled(rdev)) { + /* + * In set_machine_constraints() we may have turned this regulator on + * but we couldn't propagate to the supply if it hadn't been resolved + * yet. Do it now. + */ + if (rdev->use_count) { ret = regulator_enable(rdev->supply); if (ret < 0) { _regulator_put(rdev->supply); rdev->supply = NULL; return ret; } - rdev->use_count = 1; } return 0; -- 2.19.0.rc2
| |