Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 6 Nov 2018 18:05:44 +0900 | From | Sergey Senozhatsky <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/3] lockdep: Use line-buffered printk() for lockdep messages. |
| |
On (11/06/18 09:38), Petr Mladek wrote: > > If you would want to avoid buffering, you could set the number > of buffers to zero. Then it would always fallback to > the direct printk().
This printk-fallback makes me wonder if 'cont' really can ever go away. We would totally break cont printk-s that trapped into printk-fallback; as opposed to current sometimes-cont-works-just-fine.
-ss
| |