Messages in this thread | | | From | Vitaly Mayatskih <> | Date | Sun, 4 Nov 2018 22:28:34 -0500 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/1] vhost: add per-vq worker thread |
| |
On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 9:53 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> I wonder whether or not it's better to allow the device to specific the > worker here instead of forcing a per vq worker model. Then we can keep > the behavior of exist implementation and do optimization on top?
I was thinking about that too, but for the sake of simplicity it sounds valid that if the user wanted 8 parallel queues for the disk, they better be parallel, i.e. worker per queue. The rest of disks that don't need high-performance, can have 1 queue specified.
-- wbr, Vitaly
| |