Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 3 Nov 2018 08:51:24 -0400 | From | Sasha Levin <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 4.14 053/143] x86/power: Fix some ordering bugs in __restore_processor_context() |
| |
On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 09:41:51AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 09:40:16AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 07:17:34PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: >> > On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 08:19:36PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: >> > > Hi Greg, >> > > >> > > On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 6:51 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman >> > > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. >> > > >> > > This has been fixed by another upstream commit: >> > > 7ee18d677989 ("x86/power: Make restore_processor_context() sane") >> > > >> > > You can not directly apply it, will need backporting. >> > >> > It depends on the following commits: >> > >> > 5b06bbcfc2c6 x86/power: Fix some ordering bugs in __restore_processor_context() >> > 090edbe23ff5 x86/power/64: Use struct desc_ptr for the IDT in struct saved_context >> > 896c80bef4d3 x86/power/32: Move SYSENTER MSR restoration to fix_processor_context() >> > 7ee18d677989 x86/power: Make restore_processor_context() sane >> > >> > Greg, any objections to pulling them all in? >> >> No objection, but can I just drop this patch here (it's also in the 4.9 >> queue) and then all of these be added to your next round of patches to >> be pulled in after this release? >> >> That should make it easier, and more ovbious to test this all together. > >I've now dropped this patch from the 4.9 and 4.14 queues as that makes >sense here.
Thanks Greg, I'll prepare all 5 for the next cycle.
-- Thanks, Sasha
| |