lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Nov]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v3] genirq/affinity: Create and transfer more irq desc info by a new structure
From
Date
Hi Bjorn,

on 2018/11/29 4:00, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc linux-pci]
> Since you mention reports, are there URLs to mailing list archives you
> can include?
OK, I will add it:

https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=153543887027997&w=2

>> - entry = alloc_msi_entry(&dev->dev, nvec, masks);
>> + entry = alloc_msi_entry(&dev->dev, nvec, affi_desc);
>
> Can you split this into two or more patches? Most of these changes

Yes, next non-RFC version will do.

> are trivial and not very interesting, and the fact that they're all in
> one patch makes it hard to find and review the interesting bits. For
> example,
>
> 1) Rename all the local variables while keeping the type the same
> (or just leave the name the same; I think "affinity" would be a fine
> name, and I would be OK if we ended up with "struct irq_affinity_desc
> *masks" or "struct irq_affinity_desc *affinity"). This patch would
> obviously have no functional impact and would remove a lot of the
> trivial changes.
> Oops, how stupid I am !

> 2) Add "struct irq_affinity_desc" containing only "struct cpumask
> masks" and irq_create_affinity_desc() (or leave the name as
> irq_create_affinity_masks() and adjust the signature). This would
> also have no functional impact and would be a fairly trivial patch.
> > 3) Add "flags" to struct irq_affinity_desc and the related code.
> This is the real meat of your patch, and with the above out of the
> way, it will be much smaller and it'll be obvious what the important
> changes are.
>
I see, :)

Thanks,
dou

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-11-29 15:37    [W:0.069 / U:0.640 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site