lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Nov]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] pvcalls-front: fixes incorrect error handling
From
Date
On 11/27/18 3:37 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2018, PanBian wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 03:31:39PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> On 11/21/18 9:07 PM, Pan Bian wrote:
>>>> kfree() is incorrectly used to release the pages allocated by
>>>> __get_free_page() and __get_free_pages(). Use the matching deallocators
>>>> i.e., free_page() and free_pages(), respectively.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Pan Bian <bianpan2016@163.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c | 4 ++--
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
>>>> index 2f11ca7..77224d8 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
>>>> @@ -385,8 +385,8 @@ static int create_active(struct sock_mapping *map, int *evtchn)
>>>> out_error:
>>>> if (*evtchn >= 0)
>>>> xenbus_free_evtchn(pvcalls_front_dev, *evtchn);
>>>> - kfree(map->active.data.in);
>>>> - kfree(map->active.ring);
>>>> + free_pages((unsigned long)map->active.data.in, PVCALLS_RING_ORDER);
>>> Is map->active.data.in guaranteed to be NULL when entering this routine?
>> I am not sure yet. Sorry for that. I observed the mismatches between
>> __get_free_page and kfree, and submitted the patch.
>>
>> But I think your consideration is reasonable. A better solution is to
>> directly free bytes, a local variable that holds __get_free_pages return
>> value. If you agree, I will rewrite the patch.
> Like Boris said, map->active.ring and map->active.data.in are not
> guaranteed to be NULL or != NULL here. For instance,map->active.ring can
> be != NULL and map->active.data.in can be NULL. However, free_pages and
> free_page should be able to cope with it, the same way that kfree is
> able to cope with it?

If map->active.data.in can be non-NULL on entry to this routine then I
think this has been a problem all along. Pan's suggestion to use bytes
for freeing is going to solve this (assuming bytes will be initialized
to NULL).


-boris


>
>>> -boris
>>>
>>>> + free_page((unsigned long)map->active.ring);
>>>> return ret;
>>>> }
>>>>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-11-27 22:00    [W:0.101 / U:0.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site