lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Nov]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 1/3] sh: add __NR_syscalls along with NR_syscalls
Hi Arnd,

On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 at 22:21, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 5:32 AM Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > NR_syscalls macro holds the number of system call exist
> > in sh architecture. We have to change the value of NR-
> > _syscalls, if we add or delete a system call.
> >
> > One of the patch in this patch series has a script which
> > will generate a uapi header based on syscall.tbl file.
> > The syscall.tbl file contains the total number of system
> > calls information. So we have two option to update NR_sy-
> > scalls value.
> >
> > 1. Update NR_syscalls in asm/unistd.h manually by count-
> > ing the no.of system calls. No need to update NR_sys-
> > calls until we either add a new system call or delete
> > existing system call.
> >
> > 2. We can keep this feature it above mentioned script,
> > that will count the number of syscalls and keep it in
> > a generated file. In this case we don't need to expli-
> > citly update NR_syscalls in asm/unistd.h file.
> >
> > The 2nd option will be the recommended one. For that, I
> > added the __NR_syscalls macro in uapi/asm/unistd_32/64.h
> > along with NR_syscalls which is moved to asm/unistd.h.
> > The macro __NR_syscalls also added for making the name
> > convention same across all architecture. While __NR_sys-
> > calls isn't strictly part of the uapi, having it as part
> > of the generated header to simplifies the implementation.
> > We also need to enclose this macro with #ifdef __KERNEL__
> > to avoid side effects.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@linaro.org>
>
> Looks correct to me, but since there are only three references to
> 'NR_syscalls' in arch/sh, I wonder if we should just replace it with
> __NR_syscalls in the same patch.

This is the approach I had initially, But someone pointed out that doing
this way - #define NR_syscalls __NR_syscalls would be better. The
only difference is here the number of occurrence 3 and there 5-7
occurrence of NR_syscalls.

Thanks
Firoz

>
> Arnd

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-11-20 08:07    [W:0.141 / U:0.184 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site