Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 16 Nov 2018 21:24:03 +0100 | From | Borislav Petkov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v17 01/23] x86/sgx: Update MAINTAINERS |
| |
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 05:07:14PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > Yes, I think it could be renamed as sgx.c. Should the driver part be > also called as sgx.ko?
I guess that's your call guys. The reason why I asked is because I like shorter names and "sgx" is unambiguous enough. AFAICT, there's no one else doing SGX atm.
:-)
-- Regards/Gruss, Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
| |