lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Nov]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Subject[GIT pull] locking fixes for 4.20
From
Date
Linus,

please pull the latest locking-urgent-for-linus git tree from:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git locking-urgent-for-linus


A single fix for a build fail with CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES=y in the
qspinlock code.

Thanks,

tglx

------------------>
Peter Zijlstra (1):
x86/qspinlock: Fix compile error


arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
index 87623c6b13db..bd5ac6cc37db 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
@@ -13,12 +13,15 @@
#define queued_fetch_set_pending_acquire queued_fetch_set_pending_acquire
static __always_inline u32 queued_fetch_set_pending_acquire(struct qspinlock *lock)
{
- u32 val = 0;
-
- if (GEN_BINARY_RMWcc(LOCK_PREFIX "btsl", lock->val.counter, c,
- "I", _Q_PENDING_OFFSET))
- val |= _Q_PENDING_VAL;
+ u32 val;

+ /*
+ * We can't use GEN_BINARY_RMWcc() inside an if() stmt because asm goto
+ * and CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES=y results in a label inside a
+ * statement expression, which GCC doesn't like.
+ */
+ val = GEN_BINARY_RMWcc(LOCK_PREFIX "btsl", lock->val.counter, c,
+ "I", _Q_PENDING_OFFSET) * _Q_PENDING_VAL;
val |= atomic_read(&lock->val) & ~_Q_PENDING_MASK;

return val;
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-11-11 09:12    [W:0.083 / U:2.664 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site