Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 4 Oct 2018 12:02:20 +0200 | From | David Sterba <> | Subject | Re: [PATCHv2] btrfs: list usage cleanup |
| |
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 12:48:27PM +0800, zhong jiang wrote: > Trival cleanup, list_move_tail will implement the same function that > list_del() + list_add_tail() will do. hence just replace them. > > Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> > --- > fs/btrfs/send.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/send.c b/fs/btrfs/send.c > index 094cc144..30e7e12 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/send.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/send.c > @@ -2075,8 +2075,8 @@ static struct name_cache_entry *name_cache_search(struct send_ctx *sctx, > */ > static void name_cache_used(struct send_ctx *sctx, struct name_cache_entry *nce) > { > - list_del(&nce->list); > - list_add_tail(&nce->list, &sctx->name_cache_list); > + /* delete from sctx->name_cache_list and add as its tail */ > + list_move_tail(&nce->list, &sctx->name_cache_list);
The suggestion was to drop name_cache_used and replace it with list_move_tail(...), the comment as you wrote it does not bring much information as it merely repeats how list_move_tail is implemeted. A useful comment explains something that's not obvious.
| |