Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] mm, drm/i915: mark pinned shmemfs pages as unevictable | From | Dave Hansen <> | Date | Wed, 31 Oct 2018 07:40:14 -0700 |
| |
On 10/31/18 7:24 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > I am also wondering whether unevictable pages culling can be > really visible when we do the anon LRU reclaim because the swap path is > quite expensinve on its own.
Didn't we create the unevictable lists in the first place because scanning alone was observed to be so expensive in some scenarios?
Or am I misunderstanding your question.
| |