Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] irqchip: ti-sci-inta: Add support for Interrupt Aggregator driver | From | Lokesh Vutla <> | Date | Sat, 27 Oct 2018 01:49:41 +0530 |
| |
Hi Marc,
[..snip..] >> [...] >> >>>>> +/** >>>>> + * ti_sci_inta_register_event() - Register a event to an interrupt aggregator >>>>> + * @dev: Device pointer to source generating the event >>>>> + * @src_id: TISCI device ID of the event source >>>>> + * @src_index: Event source index within the device. >>>>> + * @virq: Linux Virtual IRQ number >>>>> + * @flags: Corresponding IRQ flags >>>>> + * @ack_needed: If explicit clearing of event is required. >>>>> + * >>>>> + * Creates a new irq and attaches to IA domain if virq is not specified >>>>> + * else attaches the event to vint corresponding to virq. >>>>> + * When using TISCI within the client drivers, source indexes are always >>>>> + * generated dynamically and cannot be represented in DT. So client >>>>> + * drivers should call this API instead of platform_get_irq(). >>>> >>>> NAK. Either this fits in the standard model, or we adapt the standard >>>> model to catter for your particular use case. But we don't define a new, >>>> TI specific API. >>>> >>>> I have a hunch that if the IDs are generated dynamically, then the model >>>> we use for MSIs would fit this thing. I also want to understand what >>> >>> hmm..I haven't thought about using MSI. Will try to explore it. But >>> the "struct msi_msg" is not applicable in this case as device does not >>> write to a specific location. >> >> It doesn't need to. You can perfectly ignore the address field and >> only be concerned with the data. We already have MSI users that do not >> need programming of the doorbell address, just the data. >
Just one more clarification.
First let me explain the IRQ routes a bit deeply. As I said earlier there are three ways in which IRQ can flow in AM65x SoC 1) Device directly connected to GIC - Device IRQ --> GIC 2) Device connected to INTR. - Device IRQ --> INTR --> GIC 3) Devices connected to INTA. - Device IRQ --> INTA --> INTR --> GIC
1 and 2 are straight forward and we use DT for IRQ representation. Coming to 3 the trickier part is that Input to INTA and output from INTA and dynamically managed. To be more specific: - By hardware design there are certain set of physical global events(interrupts) attached to an INTA. Out of which a certain range are assigned to the current linux host that can be queried from system-controller. - Similarly out of all the INTA outputs(referenced as vints) a certain range can be used by the current linux host.
So for configuring an IRQ route in case 3, the following steps are needed: - Device id and device resource index for which the interrupt is needed - A free event id from the range assigned to the INTA in this host context - A free vint from the range assigned to the INTA in this host context - A free gic IRQ from the range assigned to the INTR in this host context.
With the above information, linux should send a message to system-controller using TISCI protocol. After policing the given information, system-controller does the following: - Attaches the interrupt(INTA input) to the device resource index - Muxes the interrupt(INTA input) to corresponding vint(INTA output) - Muxes the vint(INTR input) to GIC irq(INTR output).
For grouping of interrupts, the same vint number is to be passed to system-controller for all the requests.
Keeping all the above in mind, I see the following as software IRQ Domain Hierarchy:
1) INTA multi MSI --> 2)INTA -->3) MSI --> 4) INTR -->5) GIC
INTA driver has to set a chained IRQ using virq allocated from its parent MSI. This is to differentiate the grouped interrupts within INTA.
Inorder to cover the above two MSI domains, a new bus driver has to be created as I couldn't find a fit with the existing bus drivers.
Does the above approach make sense? Please correct me if i am wrong.
Thanks and regards, Lokesh
| |