lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] arm64: new board - Emlid Neutis N5
Hi,

> >>  +/ {
> >>  + model = "Emlid Neutis N5 Developer board";
> >>  + compatible = "emlid,emlid-neutis-n5-devboard",
> >>  + "emlid,emlid-neutis-n5",
> >>
> >> Do you need the two emlid there? What comes before the comma is the
> >> vendor, while what is after is the model.
> >  
> > I think emlid-neutis-n5 module could be useful in the future, no need
> > this now.
>
> You misunderstand: The point would be to use, e.g., "emlid,neutis-n5"
> instead of "emlid,emlid-neutis-n5" with duplicate "emlid,emlid-". It is
> orthogonal to having multiple compatible strings.

Oh, I agree. No need to duplicate "emlid". Thank you!

> >>  +&uart1 {
> >>  + pinctrl-names = "default";
> >>  + pinctrl-0 = <&uart1_pins>, <&uart1_rts_cts_pins>;
> >>  + status = "okay";
> >>  +};
> >>
> >> I guess this is for bluetooth? Have you tested serdev drivers?
> >>
> > Yes, bluetooth is connected over uart1.
> > You mean if I have tested bluetooth stack via serial device?
>
> Not quite, we're missing a child node within uart1 for a serdev driver.
> Is there no such driver yet for your Bluetooth chipset, or did you not
> yet check?

Got it. I haven't checked a serdev driver.

Maxim, the SoM can't be run without a motherboard. According to your last message
I don't change dts files, right?

Aleksandr

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-10-12 11:36    [W:1.574 / U:0.420 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site